Blog

Archive for May, 2009

Incredimail (MAIL) May Continue to Surprise Investors in the Year Ahead

Introduction

As we’ve noted in the past, we at Envoy love a good software turnaround story. The high margins and low capital needs of many software businesses, can lead to impressive earnings recoveries and explosive capital gains in the event that the company’s operations are realigned in a strategically correct manner.

IncrediMail (NASDAQ: MAIL), an Israeli provider of mostly free email and instant messaging (IM) software, is the latest software business to really grab our attention. After a management reshuffle, the company has focused more keenly on improving monetization of its core offerings, while simultaneously trimming corporate costs. The success of IncrediMail’s new strategic direction was made crystal clear in the firm’s recent financial results for Q1 2009.

After a long stretch of delivering pretty modest profits and some small losses, IncrediMail announced very robust first quarter earnings. Revenue rose 34%, but at the same time operating expenses fell 32%. The result was $2.5 million in operating profit, compared to a $900,000 loss in the prior year. Management had previously been guiding for $5 million in EBITDA for all of 2009. That target has since been raised to $7 million in operating income, which in our opinion remains a very low hurdle.

In addition to this improvement in profitability, we’re also intrigued by IncrediMail’s debt-free balance sheet, and the company’s plans for its excess cash. One encouraging move was the company’s share buyback, the first phase of which was recently completed. Even more appealing is the institution of an annual dividend policy, with a proposed $0.50/share one-time dividend now working its way through the Israeli court and regulatory system.

To get a better handle on the changes that have recently driven the stock to 52-week highs, as well as what lies ahead for the company, we recently checked in with Jeff Holzmann, President of IncrediMail.

Envoy Global Interview


Envoy Global Research (EGR):
Can you briefly describe your main free software products, who the target customers are, and how you currently generate revenue from these products?


Jeff Holzmann (JH):
Our flagship product, IncrediMail Xe, is a free e-mail client that enables users to customize their e-mails with a wide range of graphics, sound, and multimedia content. The program, with an active user base of over 7 million, offers a simple interface which appeals to less computer-savvy users. Our demographic for that product tends to skew female, with 69% of users over the age of 32. From IncrediMail Xe, users can pay to upgrade to the more fully-featured IncrediMail Premium.

Other offerings of ours include Magentic and PhotoJoy, both of which allow desktop enhacement through things like wallpaper, widgets, and screensavers. HiYo — our “rising star,” if you will — is a free add-on to instant messaging clients like MSN Messenger. HiYo offers unique animations, sound effects, winks, nudges and a wide selection of emoticons to enhance the users’ chatting experience. This program has seen over 5.5 million registered downloads since its introduction late last year, and is popular with a younger, more tech-savvy demographic.

Basically, we generate revenue in four different ways. The product sales via upgrades to premium software are straightforward enough. But, we also generate ad revenue by displaying banners on our website and in our free software. In addition, we have brand licensing and promotion arrangements with operators of third party websites. Finally, and most importantly, the vast majority of our revenue is generated via search queries, which is monetized with cost-per-click advertising (CPC) thru programs developed by major search engine providers like Google and InfoSpace.


EGR:
Can you please describe the major transitions that Incredimail has gone through over the last few years?

JH: There have been two major shifts, one involving management and the other being a big change in our revenue strategy.

First, with regards to management, the reins were passed from Yaron Adler to his cousin and co-founder Ofer Adler in early 2008. Whereas Yaron was interesting in pursuing several new growth areas, Ofer has refocused on the core opportunity of driving search revenue via our free software offerings. This has allowed the company to reduce headcount, discontinue less promising business efforts, and really hone in on our fastest-growing source of revenue.

On the strategy front, our sales efforts used to focus primarily on upgrading our users from the free products to the premium offerings. Perhaps 2% of users would upgrade, and 98% would stick with the free software. Not the best model, perhaps, but it’s the one we IPO’d with, and we did generate nice profits from that business. In late 2006 though, the company began experimenting with Google’s AdSense program to try and monetize those other 98% of our users. Google quickly became a very important partner for us, and their AdSense program has been the main revenue driver for our company ever since.

EGR: How exactly does the Google relationship work?

JH: What happens is that the user downloads our software for free. Then, during installation, we give her the option of setting her home page to a very basic, Google-powered search portal called MyStart. This is very similar to when people download the Firefox browser, and their start page becomes a Google powered search portal. 86% of people downloading our software choose this Google-power search option homepage.

When the user searches the web by starting from our Google-powered start page, text ads will appear alongside these searches in Google, and other search providers, like Infospace. Advertisers pay Google and Infospace for these ads on a pay-per-click basis. Google, in turn, shares those advertising revenues with partners, like Incredimail, who help drive search traffic to Google. Collectively, our users are conducting over 100 million searches, or queries, per month.

Revenue from search surpassed our product sales in 2007, accounted for more than half of total revenue in 2008, and hit 71% of sales in the most recent quarter. There are no direct costs associated with these sales, resulting in extremely high gross margins for the company.

EGR: Since your revenue is a function of the number of people who download your free software products, how do you market these products and generate downloads in a cost-effective manner?

JH: There are various ways to market free software on the Internet. The basic strategy for most companies is to buy online advertising via keyword pay-per-click programs or banner ads. While we have done that in the past, and continue to engage in media buying activities to promote new products like HiYo, our main marketing strategy is a viral one. By that I mean that we rely on our users to bring in additional users, whether that’s friends, family, or whomever those users communicate with using our software.

So for example, say you send out an IncrediMail email with some animations that your cousin finds really entertaining. He sees a link at the bottom of the e-mail, and clicks through to download a copy of his own. A similar principle is at work with our HiYo instant messenger add-on. If you don’t have HiYo installed, and a HiYo-created instant message pops up, it informs you that you can only view the special emoticons included in your friend’s IM if you download the add-on yourself. This self-propagating marketing mechanism works quite well for us, and costs next to nothing.

EGR: So your search business has been growing fast, with this cheap viral marketing driving downloads. Why, then, did the company’s operating profits stay relatively flat until just recently?

JH: This is a function of a few factors. First, as I mentioned, the company was chasing several different market opportunities under the former CEO, and the related expenses have only recently dropped away. Second, the search monetization process takes time to fine tune. The more time we spend working with partners like Google, the better we get at maximizing search revenues from our free software downloads. Third, as I mentioned, we chose to do some media buying to support the HiYo launch last year. That marketing spend saw no offsetting revenue initially, as we didn’t begin monetizing the program immediately. However, since the beginning of 2009, we’ve significantly reduced the media buying and let the viral marketing take over. Now that HiYo has this momentum in place, we are able to start ramping revenue from the product without much additional expense.

Basically, the dramatic growth in profits we recently reported is the result of a transition to a new cost structure, a new revenue model, and the monetization of a new product. The results of these changes are reflected in recent financial results, but the success didn’t happen overnight.

EGR: Looking beyond the monetization of HiYo, can you outline the ways that IncrediMail intends to sustain topline growth in future years? Is that primarily driven by new software products?

JH: New products are certainly an important part of that equation, and one example of that would be our desktop enhacement program, PhotoJoy, which is currently in beta, but we believe will have mass appeal.

But, let’s not ignore our current slate of offerings, however. With product upgrades, such as the forthcoming IncrediMail 2, we can both retain existing users and bring additional customers in for the first time. We expect both new and upgraded products, after some initial marketing support, to quickly move into a position where they can drive search revenue with little associated ongoing cost.

Finally, we think there is substantial opportunity to potentially acquire other small software companies that have an interesting free software product, but may not have the needed corporate infrastructure to develop a large scale and profitable business around these downloads.

EGR: On the financial front, we noticed that your company recently announced a one-time dividend, as well as an ongoing annual dividend. Can you please explain the rationale behind this decision as well as where the company now stands in terms of delivering the dividend?

JH: Yes, concurrent with our year-end results in March, the Board announced a new annual dividend policy that will pay out at least 50% of annual net income, beginning with fiscal 2009. Soon afterward, the Board also approved a $0.50 per share dividend to be paid for fiscal 2008.

This policy is a result of listening to our investors, many of whom have asked why we are sitting on so much cash. In fact, at one point last year, the value of our stock was well beneath the level of cash sitting on our balance sheet. We definitely do not need that much cash to run this business, and we therefore think it is a shareholder-friendly move to dividend out our extra cash. With our CEO and other insiders holding a large amount of stock, management is of course receptive to any steps that will maximize total shareholder returns over the long run.

Now, as an Israeli company, the dividend enactment is somewhat more complex than many of your readers might be used to seeing. For the 2008 dividend, we have to obtain the approval of the Israeli court, due to the size of the proposed payout, which slightly exceeds our net income for the year. We expect to receive approval within a few weeks.

We are also waiting to see the level of withholding tax to be levied by the Israeli tax authorities. Basically, our tax structure will likely change because of the dividend, and we’re guiding for a 31% effective rate, like we reported in the first quarter, going forward.

EGR: What should investors look out for over the next 1 to 3 years to gauge success at IncrediMail?

JH: Investors should look for continued growth in revenue, allowing for the usual seasonality of our business due to Internet usage trends. Combined with strict cost controls, we should produce solid bottom-line results. Expenses will always be front-loaded when it comes to the launch of a new or upgraded product, but I believe HiYo will demonstrate that those are dollars well spent. Expect us to continue developing new products to complement our existing lineup, as well as upgrades to our most popular products like IncrediMail and HiYo. Both activities will keep people downloading our software and engaging with the products, and that in turn will drive search revenue.

EGR: Thanks for your time, Jeff, and best of luck.

Conclusion

After nearly a year and a half of transition, it appears as though IncrediMail is set to continue growing significantly in the years ahead. In the coming quarters, revenue ought to rise at a solid rate, but the most dramatic difference will be seen on the bottom line. With expenses cut to current low levels, we expect a series of very favorable year-over-year earnings comps. Our earnings model also suggests that operating income could potentially surpass management guidance.

With the first quarter results, the market has only just started to recognize why Incredimail’s business is so attractive. The company has very low incremental costs, in terms of R&D and marketing, to support existing products. As such, the resulting search revenue is extremely profitable, and the cash being thrown off by this streamlined operation is now being put right into shareholders’ pockets via the annual dividend.

Despite the recent run up in the stock price following Q1 results, we think Incredimail is still virtually unknown to most investors and therefore still has significant upside potential should our expectations for continued robust results in 2009 prove accurate.

Disclosure: Affiliates of Envoy Global Research, and its principals, own shares in MAIL. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.

The Inflation Monster Appears to be Awakening

The foolishness of the Fed’s money printing scheme to save insolvent financial institutions is starting to show, as the inflation monster appears to be awakening. Oil prices are now near $60 and risky asset prices are soaring. It’s seemingly only a matter of time before prices skyrocket in the broader “real” economy. One wonders how engendering massive inflation will help cure our economic ills particularly at a time when most people are still facing financial difficulties.

Sell When You Can Not When You Have To

As we all are presumably enjoying this continued massive stock market rally, I think it’s wise to remember the classic trading rule:
Sell When You Can Not When You Have To.

I believe it’s impossible to time a bottom or a top in the Market, so the intelligible thing to do is buy early when valuations are low and sell out early when valuations are more than reasonable (which I think is the case now for many micro cap stocks that have recently tripled). You don’t want to be around when the music stops, even if it means giving up another 10% upside.

The Turnaround at Merge Healthcare Continues: Updated Interview with CEO Justin Dearborn

Introduction

When we first wrote about Merge Healthcare (Nasdaq: MRGE), this software turnaround story had reported just one full quarter of results under the new management team and Board watch. Nevertheless, we were attracted to the potential of Merge’s imaging software business, and were impressed by the new crew’s quick restructuring efforts which paid off in a fast return to positive operating income and free cash flow after many quarters of losses.

Since our last report, Merge has continued to demonstrate solid financial results. Notably, in the final quarter of 2008, the company reported $15.1 million in revenue — a slight year-over-year decline, but nevertheless a sequential improvement over the prior quarter. Operating income jumped to $3.7 million, compared to $1.3 million in the prior quarter and a large loss a year earlier. Cash flow was also strong, as evidenced by the $3.4 million bump in Merge’s cash balance.

Importantly, in the company’s most recently reported quarter for Q1 of 2009, Merge continued to demonstrate substantial financial improvement. During the first quarter, revenues again increased sequentially, but also showed a 11.5% rise year-over-year, despite the economic downturn. As well, profitability remained solid, with operating income improving to $3.5 million, as compared to a significant $8.4 million loss last year. The company’s balance sheet also continued to strengthen, with cash now at about $20 million, up nearly $6 million in just a few quarters.

The new team at Merge has pulled off this impressive financial turnaround by removing a good chunk of costs from the business, including such actions as exiting the teleradiology business, to closing the company’s Atlanta office. In addition, the management team has done a great job in retaining the company’s credibility with customers during this difficult restructuring, as evidenced by the stable, and growing, top line figures.

Satisfied with the firm’s financial stability, we’re now more focused on Merge’s growth potential. Specifically, we’re interested in the impact on Merge’s business of the Obama administration’s Stimulus Package, which has earmarked about $31 billion for healthcare IT. There’s also the growing Chinese market, which has the possibility to eventually surpass the U.S. healthcare market in terms of technology uptake.

To get a better handle on these and other growth initiatives, we recently held a follow-up talk with Justin Dearborn, CEO of Merge Healthcare.

Envoy Global Interview

Envoy Global Research (EGR): Aside from the Obama stimulus plan generating “a tide that lifts all boats,” scenario in healthcare IT, is there any direct revenue opportunity here based on Merge’s product slate? What sort of technology does the Administration seek to support?

Justin Dearborn (JD): At its heart, the bill intends to incentivize healthcare providers to use IT to gain efficiency and cost savings for the overall healthcare system. Our hospital and imaging center customers have seen concrete savings and efficiencies from using our solutions, and we believe they will be able to participate in the stimulus plan. To that end, we are building a consortium of customers to discuss the mechanisms needed to ensure that imaging solutions are eligible for incentives.

One of the key buzz words you’ll hear in the industry today around the stimulus plan, is interoperability. That really speaks to our roots at Merge, as a leader in enabling medical devices to communicate with one another since the inception of digital imaging and the DICOM standard.

Our toolkits provide the basics needed for any software application to be able to move images using the correct “language.” We also have platforms like our Cedara C4™ technology that serve as middleware for interoperability of software applications. In addition, we have applications that help with things like web transfer of images — applications that any health IT vendor can integrate into their finished solution.

We like to say that we can “image enable” any solution, which is of great benefit to general health IT vendors of solutions like EMRs [electronic medical records] or HIS’s [health information systems]. As EMR providers such as Allscripts clearly stand to benefit directly from the Stimulus package, this is a great target market for our OEM solutions.

EGR: You recently announced a customer win for your new MergeCOM-3™ HL7 toolkit. How does that fit into the Stimulus opportunity?

JD: Again, this is about interoperability. The key thing to note about HL7 is that it goes well beyond imaging, which has been the market addressed by our DICOM toolkits in the past. Whereas DICOM is the language of the image itself, HL7 enables transmission of all the other information that comes along with that image. So this really opens up our access to the broader HIS market. We believe that as EMR’s proliferate there will be a growing need for solutions like our HL7 toolkit, and so we remain optimistic about MergeCOM-3™ HL7, and we have seen excellent reception to the product in the marketplace. We already signed our first customer for the technology, and the toolkit is planned for release this quarter.

EGR: Last time we spoke, you mentioned the negative impact of the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) on your imaging center customers. These providers have been under intense scrutiny, as an identified source of cost inflation in U.S. medical care. Do you think the Stimulus package will relieve some of the regulatory pressure faced by these imaging providers?

JD: Probably not. I think the government will be on constant watch for ways to control healthcare costs. One tool — the “carrot” — is to incentivize providers to adopt cost savings processes, like IT. Another tool — the “stick” — is to limit reimbursement for other processes, and imaging will undergo ongoing scrutiny in this area. A third tool is to limit usage, and all payors are definitely focused on this, employing both Radiology Business Management companies and increased pre-authorization rules. Imaging is an expensive and high-volume area of healthcare delivery, so it will continue to be under the cost microscope.

The good news for us in this is that our customers realize cost savings with our solutions. So that potentially puts them within reach of the Stimulus’ carrot. I would also add that we have customers who have not only survived, but thrived, under the DRA. They run efficient growth businesses, and our solutions have been critical to their success. We are confident that we can continue to be a good partner to them despite the ongoing pressure.

EGR: Before we look to potential growth in international markets, can you talk to us about opportunities for your legacy radiology solutions (PACS/RIS) in North America?

JD: Although radiology PACS penetration in the US has been pegged at perhaps 90% for large imaging providers, well over half of small volume sites still do not have PACS. We believe there are thousands of clinical sites, in just the U.S., that still use film. Of course, full-blown PACS systems with all the bells and whistles can be prohibitively expensive. For smaller sites, though, our eFilm Archive serves as a “mini-PACS” of sorts. In addition, our hosted solution is another great option, due to the low up-front cost.

I should note that PACS has moved beyond radiology into cardiology, orthopedics, endoscopy, and other clinical areas. So that’s a positive for us.

Aside from imaging center size, there is a lot of variability in penetration by modality, as well. For example, 64-slice CT is virtually 100% digital because it is impossible to read these studies in film. On the other hand, mammography is only about 50% digital.

Then, in addition to those practitioners just now moving to digital, early adopters of PACS are also looking to upgrade or replace their current solutions. So we do think the Stimulus will contribute broadly to digital imaging adoption and upgrades.

However, the combination of general market trepidation, and the complexity and uncertainty surrounding the specific Stimulus implementation, is causing some potential buyers to adopt a wait-and-see attitude. While potential customers understand the need for new technology, many feel that the investment needs to follow as-of-yet-undefined criteria. Thus, some are delaying their purchase, which is actually working against the intent of the Stimulus Act.

EGR: There is a dearth of information in English about China’s recent announcement of a $120 billion-plus medical reform plan. Since you recently just returned from China, perhaps you can give us your take on the Chinese market in general, and the impact of China’s new medical reform plan?

JD: The Chinese medical reform plan is similar to what’s happening here in the U.S., in that they have earmarked significant capital to stimulate adoption of health IT, but have not provided much detail yet on how it will actually work. However, my impression of China is that health IT may very well follow telecommunications in somewhat leapfrogging the US technology.

On my last trip, I visited a relatively new hospital that was nearly paperless. They had installed a very robust HIS from the onset of operation. We also met with multiple local EMR and HIS providers in China that have very impressive customer references and solutions.

The healthcare market in China is moving fast. As with the current US market, it is an exciting time, but more data and process specifics need to be rolled out by the government. For example, over $700 million (4.8 billion RMB) has been earmarked for the infrastructure of rural healthcare, focused on bringing every village or township with at least one clinic, complete with basic medical equipment. However, it is not clear how these clinics will be financially sustainable. Also, the bill stresses that all levels of government place healthcare as a priority on their party agenda, but it is unclear if that will translate into quantifiable quality standards. While there’s clearly some uncertainty, we feel confident that the investment and attention to healthcare in China brings us market opportunity.

EGR: How does the less mature Chinese market affect things like pricing or your marketing strategy? Also, was there a negative effect stemming from the last team’s attempted divestiture, and if so, how are you addressing that?

JD: Pricing is certainly more competitive in China and other emerging markets. They will pay for a good solution, but they won’t pay as much for it as in developed markets. The potential size of the market goes a good ways toward offsetting the impact of that pricing model. Additionally, we are seeing a trend up on software prices. Granted, this is all relative, as up until recently there was no market for software in China because it was mostly pirated. However, we now see customers both paying for software in general and being willing to pay more for solid, proven and compliant solutions.

We go to market strictly with an indirect model in China, and therefore leverage the market position of these local EMR and HIS providers.

And yes, we do have to work on regaining credibility here, as the prior management’s pullout was rather abrupt. For those who haven’t followed these developments, we canceled the planned sale of this business soon after we arrived last June. As mentioned before, I’ve made several visits to China. Our Chairman has just been there for about a week. We are definitely working hard to demonstrate that we are strongly committed to our Chinese partners.

EGR: Can you update us on your acquisition strategy? What kinds of companies are you considering? Are you looking outside the core imaging business?

JD: Acquisitions are one component of our current business strategy. First of all, we have a team in place that is experienced in doing this successfully. Click Commerce completed 9 successful acquisitions in 3 years. In addition, the market is becoming marginally more conducive to M&A. We feel like we have a creative team and a good market, so we have been looking at many options.

Along those lines, we announced on our earnings call that we acquired the assets of eko Systems, a small Virginia-based healthcare information technology solution provider. Their product line, Frontiers, captures clinical and business data for anesthesia and perfusion pre-operatively, during procedures and during the post-operative care period. This gives us a strong entry into the surgery management system market, which is highly underpenetrated. We’ve begun the integration process already by moving the business unit under Nancy Koenig, president of our Fusion business and part of the Click Commerce team. We expect this acquisition to be accretive quickly if executed well.

Merge is in the enviable position of having its largest shareholder also be its Chairman. Therefore, all acquisition opportunities are intensely scrutinized by our Board to ensure that they are in the best interest of our shareholders. This should be reassuring to investors.

EGR: Justin, thanks again for your time and best of luck.

Envoy Global Conclusion

As mentioned, we are very comfortable with Merge’s financial situation today, taking note of both the growing cash position, the expense control, top-line stability, and the return to cash profitability. We’re also quite comfortable with the Chairman’s role as both the top equity holder and sole creditor.

The next stage for Merge, however, lies beyond the low-hanging fruit of expense reductions. Over a longer investment time frame, say in the next 12-18 months, the key focus for investors should be on the progress Merge makes with new growth initiatives. Whether that comes from Merge’s new HL7 toolkit and other Stimulus growth prospects, or expansion in China and other emerging markets, or a smart acquisition, we’re pretty indifferent. There appear to be many growth avenues available to Merge, and all remain exciting and significant in size relative to the company’s current market value. Management, in a very short time period, has already created significant shareholder value, and so we look forward to tracking their progress as they begin to reignite growth at the company.

Disclosure: Affiliates of Envoy Global Research, and its principals, own shares in MRGE. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.