Members

Invest First and Investigate Later: Sometimes Intuition is Misguided

Since financial markets are incredibly efficient and since I cannot bring myself to fully research investment opportunities unless I have some real financial commitment, I’ve always subscribed to Soros’s maxim of: Invest First and Investigate Later.

Even though my gut instincts prove correct in many instances, in certain cases, such as that of UTSI, my intuition is misguided. In this post, I’ll highlight some additional information that I’ve recently uncovered that show that UTSI is not nearly as cheap as my initial thesis implied. Subscribers who have read my previous post should simply combine the information contained there with the clarifications in this post for a complete evaluation.

In terms of the balance sheet:
My initial post implied about $470 million in cash. However, in looking thru the latest conference call notes, the company estimates $100 million in cash outflow through the remainder of 2008. Taking into consideration certain cash in escrow, and other long-term investments, it’s probably best to estimate about $290 million in cash, as opposed to $470 million. This makes the company’s EV about $130 million, as opposed to -$50 million.

In terms of revenues:
In looking deeper at the company’s sales, I noticed that a significant portion of sales are generated from the company’s legacy Personal Access System (“PAS”) business. However, this business will slowly disappear. As noted in the company’s SEC filings:

“In 2008, we expect that new orders from PAS handsets and infrastructure will continue to decline due to the China telecommunication industry restructuring as well as increased pricing pressure. We expect our CDMA and TDSCDMA handsets will contribute more to our revenue and partially offset the decline of PAS business.”

Furthermore,

“We expect future PAS infrastructure spending to decline in 2008 as China prepares for 3G launch. We expect the decline in PAS infrastructure new orders will continue and we plan to aggressively pursue opportunities for our Packet PAS products (for broadband wireless data market based on PAS technology), dual mode enterprise PAS products and Softswitch products in multiple markets. However, we do not anticipate that these sales will fully offset the anticipated decline in PAS sales in 2008.”

Given my experience with a declining legacy businesses, such as experienced with ZILG, I’m inclined to assign zero value to the legacy PAS business. In addition, the company’s Broadband segment which generates about $100 million in a year in revenue has a mere 5% gross margin, implying that this business also has little value.

Overall, it’s not clear how much revenue is generated by new business ventures, nor what the odds of success is for new products. Even though management projects that new business will greatly offset the lost PAS revenue, there is no reason to trust their projections given their abysmal track record. A very conservative estimate is therefore that the new business is generating between $150 million to $200 million a year in revenue at a mid 30% gross margin.


Conclusion

If the numbers above are accurate than the current adjusted EV of $130 million implies an EV/Sales of a little less than 1 and at most an EV/Sales of 0.5. This is still cheap for this type of business, but not as cheap as originally supposed.

If UTSI is able to grow the new business revenue, such as from IPTV, then the current valuation will surely look ridiculous in hindsight. But, there is of yet no real proof that management can grow that business profitably, and as such the probability of an upside move in the stock is low. However, at the same time, it’s still difficult to see that much downside risk in the stock, considering the still large cash position and a potentially higher margin and growing revenue stream.

I’d still maintain that $3 seems about right on the downside over the next year, but that $5 is probably the most one can reasonably expect on the upside in the next twelve months, implying a fair value of about $4 for the time being. A 30% or so rise in the stock price is not that attractive for such a speculative name, so I’d recommend possibly waiting for a further dip in the stock price, possibly below $3, before initiating any position. Alternatively, one can probably wait for some financial evidence of a turnaround before buying the shares. In most instances, waiting for some financial proof of improvements in depressed stocks greatly reduces your risk, while not significantly decreasing your upside. This is because the stocks are so underfollowed by the investment community and the valuations are so depressed that it takes a significant amount of time before the shares reflect improved business prospects.

Buying Some UTSI

I’ve been following UTSI for some time and given today’s dip in the stock price, I think it’s a good time to pick up some shares (current price about $3.25).

Even though the company is still losing money, the stock price appears to assign absolutely no value to the company’s current remaining business, which throws off over $700 million in annual sales. Therefore, improvements in operating results over the next year could lead to a double in the stock price. At the same time, given the fact the company’s enterprise value is already negative, I don’t see much downside risk if results continue to disappoint. The probability of improving results over the next year has increased following recent management changes and the divestiture of the company’s largest business.

Business: UTSI is involved in IPTV with a strong presence in emerging markets. IPTV is a hot area of technology.

What Changed Here: Significant management changes and the divestiture of the company’s largest business.


The numbers:
123 million shares outstanding for a market cap of about $410 million. Following the company’s recent divestiture, UTSI will have about $470 million in cash and only about $30 million in debt. So the enterprise value here is actually negative. At the same time, the company’s remaining business throws off about $700 million in sales. Even though it loses money, I find it hard to believe that $700 million in sales is worthless.

Upside/Downside: If the company can show any indication of reaching breakeven, it’s not unreasonable to see a $7 price target, which would value the company at 0.5X EV/Sales. On the downside, as mentioned above, it’s hard to see how much lower the company’s stock can go, since the business already is assigned a negative value. Obviously, if UTSI continues to burn cash the stock will at some point be worthless, but still $700 million in sales needs to be worth something to someone and it will be many years before the company burns thru $470 million in cash. As such, I’d use $3 as the maximum downside over the next year. This implies a $5 to $6 fair value for the shares.

It is interesting to note that UTSI was a $30 stock back in 2004 and the stock is off around 40% from a July 2008 high of $5.50.

A good blog which discusses UTSI on a weekly basis can be found at:

http://utstarcom-stocknews.blogspot.com/

SolarFun (SOLF): Taking a Closer Look at the Numbers

SolarFun (SOLF), a Chinese manufacturer of polysilicon-based solar modules, recently announced financial results, which were greeted negatively by the market, but which were actually positive in certain respects. Specifically, the company’s detailed breakdown of capital outlays into cap-ex and pre-payments to suppliers, provide a more accurate measure of the company’s true profitability, and give some indication of future financing needs and cash-flow potential of SOLF. In addition, the deal with Q-Cells and the company’s gross margin projections for 2009, both signal interesting possibilities over the next year. Combined, the above factors can provide certain guidelines of how to speculate, and hopefully make money, in SOLF’s stock going forward.

As we’ve noted in past reports, we believe that operating cash-flow before expansion cap-ex is the key number to use when evaluating many of these Chinese polysilicon-based solar module manufacturers, as the accounting earnings are extremely overstated due to the pre-payment cash-outflow issue. Unfortunately, the lack of disclosure of these pre-payments and a figure for actual operating cash-flow at many companies, makes it difficult to evaluate these companies and my suspicion has always been that the companies profitability is significantly overstated. However, new management at SOLF (new CEO was hired back in January) is now providing excellent transparency into SOLF’s cap-ex and prepayments, which makes me more inclined to speculate in SOLF as opposed to other Chinese solar companies.

Getting to SOLF specifics:

Basic Capitalization Figures:
63 million shares outstanding. $153 million in cash (including the recent raise) and $360 million in debt (including converts).

Results analysis:

Capital outlays during the second quarter totaled US$ 57.2 million, of which US$ 42.4 million was for capital expenditures and US$ 14.8 million was for pre-payments to suppliers.

Note: Operating profit was $17 million during the quarter, so cash-flow from operations before cap-ex was $3 million, and after cap-ex was -$40 million. It is notable that the company did breakeven this quarter on a cash-flow basis before expansion cap-ex.

For the remainder of the year the company says:

Capital expenditures for the remainder of 2008 are anticipated to approach US$ 90 million, and an additional $70-$80 million for supplier prepayments and the LYG equity acquisition.

Note: Working thru the company’s projected numbers, I estimate the following for the second half of 2008 (only using Photovoltaic modules revenues here, as cell revenue are seemingly non-core):
Total revenue second half should be about $400 million in modules (97MW at $4.15 ASP). At 15% gross margin $60 million in gross profit and 20 million in opex brings me to $40 million operating profit. However, $75 million of that is going to prepayments and LYG, so actual operating cash-flow is negative -$35 million. Including cap-ex total cash outflow will be about -$125 million.

The company currently has about $153 million cash, after the recent secondary, implying that they surely do not need to raise any more money in 2008. However, they will run out of cash early in 2009 and will need to raise more money. How much more money is the real question.

Looking ahead into 2009:
My quick estimates are about $1.1 billion in revenue (Assumptions are 270MW and $3.85 ASP – so 50% increase in MW from 2008 and 7% decline in ASP price), and $145 million in operating profit before pre-payments, cap-ex etc. (assumptions are 19% gross margins and 5% op-ex as a % of revenue).

As to cap-ex and prepayments next year, I don’t have a clue. But, I guess it’s safe to estimate that cap-ex will be about $100 million. The company did say on the conference call that they expect moderated cap-ex in 2009.

The question mark is really prepayments. Does the company’s prepayments in 2008 cover them for 2009? Will an increase in polysilicon supply in 2009 lessen the impact of prepayments in 2009? Will the company’s increase in wafer capacity (of nearly 40%) also lessen the prepayments?

I don’t really have an answer to these questions, but my belief is that, based on the above operating profit number, and considering the fact that the company did actually breakeven this quarter on an operating cash-flow basis, the company may conceivably cover most of the prepayments and cap-ex in 2009 with operating profits, implying that there may not be a need to raise much more money in 2009 ($50 million??).

Considering the above uncertainties, it’s probably best to assign a low-end 5 multiple to my estimated 2009 operating profit number, which yields a price of $725 million for SOLF. Subtracting out debt of $360 million, yields a downside enterprise value of $365 million or about $6 per share.

On the upside, if my suspicions are correct concerning future financing needs, I would assign a 10 multiple to my 2009 operating profit number, yielding a value of about $1.5 billion or an enterprise value of about $1.1 billion, i.e. $17 per share.

Assigning a 50% probability to each scenario above, implies a fair value for SOLF at about $12 per share.

However, these numbers do not reflect the takeout value potential of SOLF, which has risen following the company’s module deal with Q-Cells. Assuming a possible takeout somewhat skews the probability percentages and multiples. I would guess that in a takeout SOLF could be worth about $25 or about 1.5X EV/Estimated Sales. Combining this number with the above would imply a fair value of about $16 for SOLF. Of course, this number again assumes certain probability percentages and depending on your belief of a takeout for Q-Cells will determine the fair value.

This brings me to my trading strategy for SOLF in the year ahead. If the stock drops significantly below $16 (figure 20% or so), it’s a good gamble, given the company’s improving financial results in 2009 and potential takeout by Q-Cells.

In case, you’re wondering about assigning somewhat arbitrary multiples to revenue and operating profit, rest assured that given the uncertainty surrounding future business and cash-flow, the above analysis is basically what financial people at Q-Cells and the investment banks will do in the event of an acquisition. The spreadsheets in presentations may be more complicated and the actual numbers maybe more accurate, but in essence nobody really knows how to value these companies and so financial analysts simply need some multiple number to justify the purchase to their bosses (and then back it up with complex spreadsheets). As such, I think the above multiples are to some extent usable for gambling on SOLF stock, and probably a bit conservative when you take into account the comps.

Taking a Closer Look at Gafisa (NYSE: GFA BP: GFASA3.SA)

Introduction
In this post, I’ll take a closer look at Gafisa (NYSE: GFA BP: GFASA3.SA), a Brazilian homebuilder which I mentioned in a previous post. What’s interesting about Gafisa is that the company appears almost impossible to value, and yet it still attracts significant interest, both from Brazilian and foreign investors. Though it’s a difficult task, I’ll attempt to provide a general, and yet still very simplified, framework for an evaluation of Gafisa. My basic assumption, given the growing momentum of mortgage securitization in Brazil, is that the best way for an outside investor to value the company, is perhaps to assign some value to the company’s growing receivable balance, while taking into consideration outstanding debt obligations.

Please note: All numbers in this post are given in REAL, not in US Dollars, unless otherwise noted.

Why is Gafisa So Difficult to Value?

If one takes the time to even do a cursory read of Gafisa’s financial filings, it will become clear quite quickly that the accounting for the company is so complicated and convoluted, that it is nearly impossible to figure out how much money the company is actually making. As such, the company’s income statements, revenue, and earnings figures, are for all intents and purposes completely meaningless when it comes to evaluating the shares. This implies that valuing Gafisa based on standard multiples, such as P/E, EV/EBITDA etc., is merely an exercise in futility.

Of course, this accounting situation is not unique to Gafisa, but is a basic problem with any real estate/homebuilder company, where the accounting is always incredibly complicated and nearly impossible to decipher. However, the difficulties are compounded further for Gafisa, given the differences in Brazilian GAAP vs. US GAAP, as well as the multitude of projects the company is undertaking in different geographic areas and economic strata of Brazil.

Truthfully, the only real way to value a company like Gafisa, would be to reconstruct the individual costs and cash-flow from each of the company’s current and past real estate projects. However, such a task is impossible for an outsider of the company, and is probably also only possible for a few insiders who have the detailed knowledge of all of Gafisa’s operations.

The Balance Sheet to the Rescue
Despite the above reservations, I still think it is possible to gain some understanding of the valuation of Gafisa by looking at its balance sheet. As I’ve mentioned in the past, the balance sheet, for most companies, is generally less misleading than the income statement, and a careful analysis of the balance sheet can shed some light on how much money a company is actually making, or losing. This can then be used to figure out some rational valuation level for the stock.

As for Gafisa, the important balance sheet metrics are the company’s current cash, debt obligations, total accounts receivables both current and long term, and the land bank.

For Gafisa the accounts receivable relates to future payments due by residential buyers of its real estate. Generally, in Brazil, as in other parts of the world, residential buyers make a down payment on real estate and then pay off the rest of the balance over time. The remaining balance of payments is recorded as accounts receivable.

As of June 2008, Gafisa reported R$3.4 billion in accounts receivables, the vast majority of which should be converted to cash over the next few years. Parenthetically, because of some accounting quirks (i.e. the company doesn’t record receivables until some revenue is recorded), this figure is not deducible from the balance sheet (i.e. the balance sheet figure is lower), but is provided by the company in its financial presentations.

Even though, the valuation of accounts receivables is always problematic, I’m willing to assume that in the case of Gafisa, these R$3.4 billion in receivables is “as good as” cash. This assumption is justified by the:
Low rate of default (i.e. less than 3% I believe) on home purchases in Brazil because of large downpayments, and other factors
Growing bank mortgage market in Brazil, whereby Gafisa, no longer needs to finance most of the receivables (i.e. home loans) on its own, but rather can work with financial institutions to reduce receivables via mortgage loans
Growing mortgage securitization market in Brazil, which will allow Gafisa to quickly convert its receivables to cash (i.e. the company estimated at least $200 million in securitizations in the June-08 financial report).

Moving onto other parts of the Balance Sheet, as of June 2008, Gafisa reported $1.4 billion in debt, and $775 million in cash. Notably, the company’s debt has nearly tripled in a year, while cash and receivables have about doubled. This of course is a negative factor, as in general I like to see cash generation significantly exceed debt issuance, just to provide some comfort that one is not investing in some type of ponzi-scheme. In the case of Gafisa, the large issuance of debt is something to further research, but probably relates to the company’s recent land purchases and other acquisitions.

The final item that is worth mentioning for Gafisa is its land reserve value, which the company estimated at R$13.5 billion as of June 2008. Any estimate of land value is of course highly speculative and not really worth evaluating. However, in the case of Gafisa it is somewhat important, as it gives a sense as to how much potential growth the company can have over the next five to ten years. The land reserve is composed of 225 different sites in 66 cities in 21 states, totaling 8.4 million square meters, equivalent to 65,273 units. Basically, given these land numbers it’s not farfetched to assume that Gafisa can at least double in size over the next few years.


Putting Together The Pieces: GFA’s Capitalization

According the latest Brazilian filings, GFA has about 126 million shares outstanding on the local Brazilian market. So at the current Braziliam REAL market price of about $22, the company has a market cap of about R$2.8 billion, and an enterprise value of about R$3.4 billion.

For the GFA ADR, the above numbers would need to adjusted based on a 2:1 ADR to Shares ratio and an assumed exchange rate. So basically, the numbers are: 63 million ADR’s outstanding and about US$375 million in debt (assuming 1.60 exchange rate), for an EV of about $US 2.1 billion.

Interestingly, from the above numbers, one can easily see how important a role currency exchange rate assumptions can play when investing in GFA or any other foreign company. Basically, if the REAL weakened to 2 to $1 vs. the US dollar (nothing out of the ordinary, since it traded at 1 to US$2.5 only two years ago), Gafisa’s Brazilian Local shares could still theoretically trade at the same price, while the ADR’s would decline by over 18%. Should the Brazilian local shares fall under this scenario, the ADR’s would really get clocked. At the same time, if the REAL strengthened vs. the dollar, the holders of the ADR could benefit even if the local shares decline.

Getting back to the valuation, the enterprise value of R$3.4 billion is matched against R$3.4 billion in receivables. While it’s difficult to say, how much of these receivables will actually turn into cash, given the fact that some of the receivable cash will need to go to ongoing construction costs and other expenses, it’s interesting to note that Gafisa has about R$600 million in current payables for land purchases and materials. This implies to me that a significant portion of the construction costs have already been paid for and that a large majority of the R$3.4 billion in receivables will turn into cash-flow over the next few years.

Subtracting the above payables balance from the receivables balance leaves about R$2.8 billion in receivables that can be turned into cash. To be conservative, one chop these receivables in half to about R$1.5 billion and then just assume that the R$1.5 billion will turn into cash over the next five years. Making another overly-simplified assumption and dividing R$1.5 billion equally over five years, assumes about R$300 million in annual operating cash-flow over the next five years, without any growth (interestingly this number about equals the annualized EBITDA of the company given 2Q 2008 numbers). This number also assumes that future down payments on new properties, and other revenue streams, will at least cover ongoing expenses, so that the R$1.5 billion in additional payments from past projects, can basically flow to the bottom line. I do not think such an assumption is unrealistic. Basically, the above cash-flow number would imply that the company is trading at about 11X EV/OCF.

The key question of course, assuming the numbers above have validity (which they certainly may not) is whether this valuation is cheap. This is of course, not an easy question to answer, given the many variables involved, but I do think that paying 11X OCF for a company that can double in the size in a few years is surely not unreasonable. This, of course, once again assumes a stable and strong currency in Brazil relative to the US dollar.

Conclusion
In conclusion, GFA’s solid receivables balance and potential for continued significant residential unit growth, suggest that the stock is quite reasonable at current prices. In addition, the favorable mortgage market in Brazil both from a financing and securitization perspective, suggest a strong macroeconomic environment for the Brazilian housing market, which would benefit GFA.

Key risks for GFA would be a slowdown in the mortgage market in Brazil and/or a significant economic slowdown in Brazil, which would make it more difficult for the average person to afford residential property.

Interesting Facts:

Some interesting facts about Real Estate in Brazil from Gafisa’s 20-F. These points are interesting when you compare the real estate prices to those currently available in the US, even after the real estate bust in the US. Note how affordable Brazilian real estate still is, especially from an income standpoint.

Luxury buildings are a high margin niche. Units usually have over 180 square meters of private area, at least four bedrooms and three parking spaces. Typically, this product is fitted with modern, top-quality materials designed by brand-name manufacturers. The development usually includes swimming pools, gyms, visitor parking, and other amenities. Average price per square meter generally is higher than R$3,600 (US$2,033). Luxury building developments are targeted to families with monthly household incomes in excess of R$20,000 (US$11,293).

Buildings targeted at middle-income customers account for the majority of our sales since our inception. Units usually have between 90 and 180 square meters of private area, three or four bedrooms and two to three underground parking spaces. Buildings are usually developed in large tracts of land as part of multi-building developments and, to a lesser extent, in smaller lots in attractive neighborhoods. Average price per square meter ranges from R$2,000 to R$3,600 (US$1,129 to US$2,033). Developments in Rio de Janeiro tend to be larger due to the large tracts of land available in Barra da Tijuca. Middle-income building developments are tailored to customers with monthly household incomes between R$5,000 and R$20,000 (US$2,823 and US$11,293).

Lower income housing developments. In Rio de Janeiro, our first project intended for lower income development was “Colinas de Campo Grande”, launched in 2000 in the neighborhood of Campo Grande, with an average sale value of R$38,000 (US$21,457). Affordable entry-level housing consists of building and house units. Units usually have between 42 to 60 square meters of indoor private area and two to three bedrooms. Average price per square meter ranges from R$1,500 to R$2,000 (US$847 to US$1,130). Affordable entry-level housing developments are tailored to families with monthly household incomes between R$1,600 and R$5,000 (approximately US$903 and US$2,823)

Note: One square meter is equal to approximately 10.76 square feet.

Speculating on a Brazil Bounce

This will be a very short write up, since additional research is available online at the company website (http://www.gafisa.com.br/ir/), and this is more a macro-call than a company specific recommendation.

Basically, the Brazilian stock market is down over 30% from its high. The reason: A sell-off in commodities (Brazil is the commodity king, so to speak), and a general reduced level of investment in emerging markets have led to a major correction in the Bovespa in the last two months. In addition, an increase in interest rates in Brazil to cool the economy has had a negative effect on the equity markets.

However, as I discovered last month on a trip to Brazil and via conversations with several businessmen there, the Brazilian economy is doing very well and there is significant optimism regarding the future. The stock market sell off really has little to do with the actual real economy in Brazil and is probably caused by selling by foreign hedge funds.

Furthermore, after two agency debt upgrades this past year, Brazil is looking to one more upgrade in 2009. A third upgrade for Brazil from the rating agencies would significantly increase investment in Brazil, benefiting all financial markets. For these reasons, I believe any significant dip (and 30% is a pretty large correction), in the Brazilian market is a buying opportunity, assuming you buy into the continued commodity boom and the growth of Brazil.

In any growing economy, one of the best investments is usually real estate. And Brazil is no exception to this rule. The housing market in Brazil is booming, as mortgages become more readily available and the income of the lower class grows (i.e. there is no real middle class in Brazil). On my recent trip to Brazil, I visited several new real estate developments and came away with the impression that the real estate boom is just getting started in Brazil.

As such, I think a good way to play a bounce in Brazil (without needing to buy shares locally), would be to invest in Gafisa (NYSE: GFA – Current Price: $28.15) ADR’s. Gafisa is one of the largest real estate developers in Brazil and Sam Zell is a big shareholder. Recently, Gafisa reported very solid financial results and I believe the company is well positioned to profit from the Brazilian real estate boom. Notably, GFA’s stock is down 44% from its high.

It is important to realize that investing in emerging markets, like Brazil, carries enormous risk. One of the main risks, is the currency risk. The Brazilian REAL has been quite strong for awhile already and should the dollar gain against the REAL, Brazilian ADR’s could drop significantly. However, I believe that the REAL will remain strong, particularly given Brazil’s higher real interest rates.

ATS Automation (ATA.TO): Reports Exceptional Results Remains a Solid and Undiscovered Alternative Energy Investment

This morning ATS Automation (ATA.TO) reported financial results that far exceeded my expectations. Overall, my feeling is still that ATA.TO remains undervalued and the stock price should increase significantly in the next year (100%) as more investors recognize that the company’s turnaround is progressing smoothly and the future outlook for the business is exceptional given the strength in solar and other alternative energy markets.

As stated in the past, the current price assigns zero value to the company’s PhotoWatt Division (solar modules, with a strong position in the market for UMG modules), and in addition undervalues the company’s main ASG business (automated manufacturing solutions – with an increasing emphasis on solar and other alternative energy markets). Briefly, I believe that the core ASG business could be worth $9 per share (less than 1X Revenue and about 10X EBITDA), while PhotoWatt could be worth about $3 per share, leading to my $12 target price for the stock.

The only negative about ATA.TO’s report today is that the company, presumably due to the PhotoWatt subsidiary, faces similar working capital issues to those confronted by other solar module manufacturers. However, since the company generated solid free cash-flow from the core ASG business, we do not expect any deterioration in the company’s balance sheet to support growth in the PhotoWatt business. Notably, at quarter end the company had $52 million in cash and about $20 million in total debt. In addition, the company fully covered it’s cap-ex requirements, including those for PhotoWatt, with current EBITDA.

Report Details
Notably, the company’s main ASG business (automated manufacturing solutions) reported over 30% top-line growth and more importantly significantly improved profitability with EBITDA margins expanding to 8.5%. My initial expectations for ASG were 7% EBITDA margins based on past history. However, new management has clearly significantly improved operating metrics at the company in a short time, and margins should continue to benefit over the next year. Additionally, revenue growth should remain strong at ASG given the company’s greatly increased backlog (Year over year, Order Backlog increased 293% in energy segment). ASG is clearly a prime beneficiary of the solar and other alternative manufacturing build out.

On the solar module front, the company’s PhotoWatt division, which is a leader in UMG modules, also reported significant revenue growth and improved profitability. I expect a spin out of PhotoWatt in the next year, which will highlight the value of this business.

IncrediMail (MAIL): Solid Results Stock Looks Great for 2009

This morning Incredimail (MAIL) announced solid financial results which support my belief that this is one of the most undervalued Internet businesses I can currently find.

When I read about the incredibly high valuations assigned to many recent Internet content acquisitions (e.g. last week Daily Candy was sold for over $100 million), it amazes me that one can still buy MAIL (at the current price of about $3.60) for a mere $12 million enterprise value. This price tag is for a business that comfortably generates $20 million a year in in online revenue (mostly via Google advertising) at over 90% gross margins! A more reasonable, and still quite conservative, valuation would be at least 2X revenue + cash, or about $6 per share.

I expect MAIL to reach this target price or higher in 2009. By then the company will have launched its new products and up-front development expenses will go down, leading to a substantial increase in the bottom line. Improving earnings momentum and a ridiculously low valuation will attract investors into the stock.

Pulse Data (PSD.TO): Another Low-Risk Oil and Natural Gas Service Stock

Introduction:
We first wrote about Pulse Data (PSD.TO) nearly two years ago, on our previous blog, CasinoCapitalism.com. Since that time, the shares have basically moved nowhere. However, we think that due to certain company changes and industry events, PSD.TO may finally provide patient shareholders a significant return in the coming year. At the same time, downside risk seems low given the company’s continued buyback program, a price that is below a previous takeout over, and considering the company’s stable and high dividend yield (6.8%).

What Does PSD.TO Do?
Pulse Data is a licensor of 2D and 3D seismic data in Canada. In fact, Pulse owns the second largest seismic data library in Canada.

What Went Wrong at Pulse?

  • Non-Core Business Produced Losses
  • Up until recently, Pulse Data owned another non-seismic related business called Terrapoint, which supplied LiDAR services. This business routinely lost money, distracted management, and may have dissuaded investors looking for a pure play seismic company from investing in PSD.TO.

  • Slowdown in Canadian Drilling Cap-Ex
  • As Pulse explains:

    “In 2007 the new Alberta royalty program and the related uncertainty led many Pulse clients to re-evaluate their spending strategies, while in 2006 the federal government’s announcement of the future taxation of income trusts beginning in 2011 caused a similar environment of concern.”

  • Confusing Financials and Low Accounting Earnings Because of Less Participation Surveys
  • In general, most investors, particularly the momentum players, understand one thing when it comes to stocks: Accounting Earnings and EPS. However, for some companies accounting earnings show a very misleading picture. This situation is very acute for seismic licensors since their two means generating revenue (i.e. data licensing and seismic surveys) have two very different impacts on accounting earnings and cash-flow. In addition, the high level of amortization at seismic companies is overlooked by investors who are focused more on accounting earnings. Basically, while data licensing greatly increases cash-flows it has no real impact on accounting earnings. At the same time, seismic surveys positively impact earnings and yet are cash-flow negative.

    This is how Pulse describes it:

    “Participation surveys create a misleading picture of revenue and earnings. Participation surveys are new, generally 3D seismic surveys which Pulse leads and to which one or more customers contribute to the initial cost. These contributions generate high levels of recorded revenues.

    But because the entire capital cost of the participation survey is capitalized and amortized, only a portion of the cost is recorded against the revenue. This accounting results in “earnings” – taxable earnings. Yet 100 percent of the funds are tied up in the survey. Participation surveys essentially create a “false positive” reading for investors. In fact, they usually generate negative free cash flow in the year they’re conducted. ”

    So to the extent that Pulse has decreased participation surveys which it did, accounting earnings will suffer and many investors will ignore the stock.

    What Has Changed?

  • Non-Core Terrapoint Business Was Sold
  • Recently, Pulse announced the sale of its Terrapoint business. As Pulse explains:

    “Pulse now focuses on what it does best: growing its 2D and 3D library of seismic data that is located in active exploration areas in western Canada, and marketing that data to the oil and natural gas industry. We have divested of non-core subsidiaries. Result: a pure play in a business niche with growth potential.”

  • Higher Natural Gas Prices and Regulatory Changes: Improve Outlook for Data Licensing and Participation Surveys
  • Pulse states:

    “after a two-year period of weakness, the recovery in natural gas prices began in the first quarter of 2008 and accelerated in the second quarter, with the Nymex natural gas futures price approaching $11 per mmbtu in late April, 2008. In early April the Government of Alberta announced revisions to its new royalty program that should partially restore deep oil and natural gas drilling incentives. This announcement removed an important element of uncertainty and potentially improves the economics of deep wells drilled in 2009 and beyond. Finally, strong successes experienced in exploratory drilling of several large unconventional natural gas and crude oil plays (including areas in which Pulse provides seismic coverage) are generating industry excitement and motivating new activities by competing companies. All of these factors bode well for seismic library data demand as well as increased demand for new participation surveys.”

    Given the above, we expect very strong revenue generation and cash-flow from Pulse in the year ahead.

  • More Participation Surveys Increase Earnings and Could Generate Investor Excitement
  • As Pulse explains,

    “In 2007 and 2006 Pulse concentrated on acquiring data by purchasing pre-owned datasets rather than committing its capital to participation surveys, partially because field acquisition costs were significantly elevated during this time. In 2008, given a more favourable industry cost structure, the Corporation plans to resume a higher level of participation surveys. The effects of seasonality on the timing of participation surveys are changing slightly, and the Corporation expects to conduct participation surveys throughout the year as opportunities arise.”

    Even though accounting earnings are not relevant to the value of the company in reality, most investors (and many quantatively-based investment strategies) only focus on accounting earnings gains. As such, the growth of participation surveys, should greatly increase PSD.TO’s earnings in the year ahead and hence bring in more investors into the stock.

    Risks
    The basic risk for PSD.TO as for any oil/natural gas service related play is greatly reduced commodity prices.

    Valuation Downside/Upside
    In order to best understand the following discussion, please view our spreadsheet for PSD.TO at:

    http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pb-Z9URIzMG28Zo1kIdKkcw

    In attempting to prove that Pulse Data has low downside risk at this level, I think there are four main considerations:
    1. Stock is still trading about 10% beneath Seitel’s last offer of around $3.20 per share. We think that an offer price from a credible competitor is probably the best measure to use for the base value of PSD.TO’s shares.
    2. Additionally, on several valuations measures, the stock is trading at a very low valuation. Management claims that PSD.TO’s seismic data has a $1 billion replacement value. However, even ignoring that number, which seems somewhat exaggerated, the stock is trading at EV/TTM EBITDA of 5, notwithstanding 80% EBITDA margins. This is cheap. Even on a fully-taxed EV/FCF of less than 15X.
    3. PSD.TO management continues to buyback shares at prices near the current price. Recently, the company bought 1.2 million shares at $2.75.
    4. The company’s dividend of $0.20 per share per year implies a yield of 6.8%. This is extraordinarily high considering current money market rates. Notably the dividend is safe and could quite possibly grow in the next year.

    In attempting to forecast an upside price, we’ll go with $5 (a 70% gain). This would represent 8.5X TTM EBITDA.

    Conclusion

    Given the strong odds of improving results at PSD.TO over the coming year, and the low valuation of the shares, we think PSD.TO offers an excellent investment opportunity.

    Disclosure: I am currently long shares of PSD.TO and I may buy and sell shares at any time without telling you about these actions. I do not have any obligation to share with you any updated information about PSD.TO in the future.

    All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.

    « Older Entries
    Newer Entries »