Government Stimulus: Does Corruption Ever Enter Into the Economic Formula?
Posted on July 10, 2009
Predictably, The Market continues to be influenced by politics, rather than economic fundamentals, and the new political debate du jour to grip Wall Street is the potential need for more government stimulus.
Government stimulus, in theory, has the potential to ease economic pain. However, the trouble is that economists, ever so adamant about designing rational policies around numbers, fail to incorporate fraud and corruption into their neat formulas.
Keynesian economics can work in an ideal world where people act ethically, however, unfortunately the reality in the US, and most profit-driven societies, is the complete opposite. So what happens when the government prints money to save banks or to prop up the production economy, is simply that the money mysteriously disappears or winds up as large bonuses. As such, all economic policies, like stimulus plans, based upon some version “trickle down economics” remain a myth and are doomed to fail.
I have, of course, no solution to this problem since our entire society is sadly built around the love of money and the acquisition thereof. The overwhelming greed and rat race, by nature, forces otherwise ethical people, into dubious pursuits.
Comments and Discussions
The section below is intended to serve as a forum for intellectual debate about particular investment ideas or theories. Please refer to this section for any updates on a particular investment idea. If you have your own thoughts, please feel free to add them. We appreciate your feedback.Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below. Please note that we only require an email for editing purposes. We will NEVER publish your email or use it in any way.
Subscribe for FREE
Enter your email below to receive free research summaries.RSS Feeds:


Quick Links
Recent Comments:
Disclaimer:
This site may include market analysis and we may own shares in the stocks mentioned in our reports. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.
Interestingly, just as I finished writing this article I saw this piece of news: $18 million Being Spent to Redesign Recovery.Gov Website
Since, I know a thing or two about web development, I can assure you that it doesn’t take anywhere near $18 million to redesign or manage Recovery.gov. Even during the first Internet bubble, spending $18 million on a website would be comical. And today with cheap web development labor overseas, and inexpensive hosting, $18 million is simply absurd.
Proof again that stimulus equals fraud.
Yehuda,
You are too jaded. Yes, the government is printing money and giving it to the banks to recapitalize them. In my view the bank recapitalization gives people who can see around the corner the opportunity to collect a lot of money by investing in a basket of banks and other financials. This worked exceedingly well for me in 1990. $20,000 in 1990 in 5 big banks turned into $200,000 in 2000 at which point I got out.
Personally, if I were in charge I would send every citizen, until employment picked up, a $2,000 per month check as a 0% interest loan with a 20% per year payback. Give it away then take it back. Let Citizens earn the spread rather than the banks. On the tax side, having run a small business, I would try making the first $20,000 of income exempt from Social Security tax. More radically, I would try Milton Friedman’s suggestion that we eliminate all taxes based on income and just print the money we need to run the government.
As you can see, I love good fantasies.
Re the banks, I am trading the UYG with a long bias.
Thanks for DITC alert, it had been on my radar for several years but I had stopped following it. I built a small position in it after your recommendation.
I will buy back FTGX if the takeover vote fails. Fortunately, I got out of half my position just above the takeover price and the other half after the RCN story.
I am 75% in cash right now.
Best wishes,
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your comments. I like your idea about checks to citizens, I’ve had similar fantasies in the past.
As for banks, not my cup of tea. Absolutely no transparency and the earnings are mostly fabricated, in my opinion. It’s absolutely impossible for any outside investor to really understand what’s going on at banks from a financial perspective. Heck even the bank regulators at the Fed don’t have a clue. Also, I strongly believe that this time is very different than 1990. All this CDS, CDO, derivative garbage was basically non-existent then. The business was much simpler then.
You really have to be comfortable investing with complete crooks, if you buy the banks. Sometimes that works out well, but usually outside investors are left out in the cold.
Anyway, if banks do somehow do return 10-fold over the next decade (and assign a very small probability of that this time around), many deep value micro cap stocks will go up more. So you’ll undoubtedly still do much better with deep value micro caps than with banks.
I guess I just feel more comfortable investing in small tech companies with clean balance sheets. I’ve lost the most money in the past, by investing in complicated balance sheet stories, of which the banks are the prime example.
Best regards,
Yehuda
By the way, if CDS is banned, and/or the vast majority of derivatives are moved to exchanges as some are proposing, banks are toast, as far as major profits. These derivatives were the secret sauce for bank “profits” for the last decade (and of course the subsequent economic collapse). I recommend reading the book “Traders, Guns and Money” by Satyajit Das.
Here’s a good article on the proposed changes for derivatives.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Geithner-seeks-more-control-rb-2881692854.html?x=0&.v=7