Stanford´s View on Internap (IIP)

Posted on March 1, 2006

For those investors without access to Wall Street research reports, this post provides some notes from Stanford Financial Group´s March 1st, 2006 research report on IIP. The analyst´s target price is a bit higher than mine, primarily because I am applying a larger discount to the EV/EBITDA multiple for IIP.

Note: If you plan to link to this post or copy it in any manner, please be sure to credit:              Stanford Financial Group (Rod Ratliff)

The source for the quotations in this post is: Stanford Financial Group (Rod Ratliff)

"The company’s FY06 outlook calls for sales growth of 5-7%, EBITDA of $16-$19  million, and a net profit (before FAS 123 stock compensation).  The latter two  data points represent SIGNIFICANT upside to consensus, and reflect the  determination of new CEO Jim DeBlasio to return value to shareholders.  The  company undertook a minor rightsizing in the 4Q, and as well expensed a
total  of $700k in severance benefits.  Two-thirds of this total could have been  expensed in 1Q06. "

"Our conversations with the Company last night indicate that a reverse stock  split will be put before the Board within the next calendar quarter.  We expectthis to be approved, and that Internap will likely seek to have its stock  listed on the NASDAQ NMS.  We believe that IIP shares will react favorably to the company’s execution  and financial outlook, and that the potential for a reverse split and NASDAQ  listing will drive demand for the shares.  We are raising our opinion to a 
speculative BUY.  We are increasing our estimates per the table to the right, and increasing  our price target to $0.65, based on 10.9x FY06 EBITDA.  This multiple is a 20%  discount to its peer group. "

"Overall, we believe that InterNAP has turned the corner.  The Company has VERY  quickly implemented a sharp focus on cost containment under new CEO Jim  DeBlasio, who outlined three core business initiatives on the call, all with  assigned and responsible owners within the management ranks, with target  metrics that must be hit, and with time lines that measure progress versus  commitment.  "
 
"1.Focus on increasing level of new customers, accelerating customer renewals,  mitigating churn, and exploring new and nontraditional revenue. 
2.Drive improvements in quote-to-cash cycle; increasing focus on marketing  products and services; reduce network costs and operating expenses. 
3.Create and retain top-notch talent.  More than 80% of Internap’s employees  are customer-facing.  "
 
"To value IIP shares, we considered EV/EBITDA multiples on a universe of  infrastructure software and internet-related comps; reinforced by a 5-year DCF  model (both analyses are included at the end of this report).  IIP shares  currently trade at a notable discount to the peer group on an EV/EBITDA basis.  To arrive at our price target, we start with the median value for FY06 
EV/EBITDA (13.6x), which we discount by 20% to account for the early stage of  the Company’s turnaround and the inherent speculative nature therein.  This  yields an FY06 EV/EBITDA multiple for IIP of 10.9x, and a per share target of  $0.65. "

Comments and Discussions

The section below is intended to serve as a forum for intellectual debate about particular investment ideas or theories. Please refer to this section for any updates on a particular investment idea. If you have your own thoughts, please feel free to add them. We appreciate your feedback.

Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below. Please note that we only require an email for editing purposes. We will NEVER publish your email or use it in any way.

Name (required)

Email (required, but NEVER published)

Website

Comments

Subscribe for FREE

Enter your email below to receive free research summaries.

Enter your email address:

RSS Feeds:



Add to Google

Quick Links


Recent Comments:

  • Yehuda Hi Thomas, "the obvious way to modify a mortgage is to leave the principal alone, stretch out the... >>Read More

  • Thomas J. Costagliola Yehuda, Maybe it is just me, but it seems that the obvious way to modify a mortgage... >>Read More

  • Thanks Appreciate your reply. Perhaps the challenge of estimating the degree to which given expectations... >>Read More

  • Yehuda Fruchter I agree, "better than expected", which is why it is important to only look at distressed... >>Read More

  • Thanks Thanks. The quote is a great reminder of Lynch's approach. Should it be qualified somewhat: "If... >>Read More

  • Disclaimer:
    This site may include market analysis and we may own shares in the stocks mentioned in our reports. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.